Craig’s List can be used to solicit, sell and
advertise a variety of wanted items, and apparently sperm is one of them (good
to know). This is how couple Jennifer Schreiner and Angela Bauer got in
touch with Marotta and arranged for him to provide his donation in 2009, which
he did free of charge. Schreiner and Bauer worked off of the “DIY” method
and did not utilize any type of medical assistance in order to conceive their
daughter, who was later born as a result of Marotta’s donation.
Everyone involved wanted to be smart about
the situation, and the parties signed a contract stating that Marotta did not
have any parental rights to the child and was not financially responsible for her,
which only seems fair, right? Wrong. Because the couple later
separated and Kansas law doesn’t recognize same-sex marriages, only the
biological mother (Schreiner) could be held legally responsible for the child.
When Schreiner later needed government assistance, the State of Kansas
sought out the father in order to have him help support the child.
Government agencies routinely come after the
non-custodial parent for child support when the other parent receives
assistance, and rightfully so. If there is a parent out there who could
provide for the child, and/or reimburse the state for monies spent on the
child, the state will make every attempt to locate him or her.
One of the most unusual aspects in this case
is that had the former couple went through a doctor for the insemination,
Marotta would not be liable under Kansas law. Apparently Kansas is taking
the position that Marotta and Schreiner could have conceived the child the old
fashioned way, whereas if they had used a doctor, it would have solidified that
he was a sperm donor and nothing more.
Marotta said he had no idea that the couple
wasn’t using a doctor, but I find that a bit hard to believe – he was trolling
on Craig’s List for a place to donate his sperm and he naturally assumed
that those same individuals would be using medical assistance when he directly
provided the product requested? That’s a bit sketchy, at best.
Marotta is appealing the decision, as one would expect. He probably imagined good karma coming his way for his donation, and instead he was hit with a lawsuit.